|
Posted by: Steve D on 2010-03-03, 05:42:38
Your number 3 is going to be the deal breaker - no investor is going to want to limit the profit he/ she can make unless you absolutely guarantee to buy the house at the agreed upon price or pay a penalty. You're asking someone to tie up their money for 4 years on the hopes that you will buy the house at a certain profit. If the house price does not reach that level of profit through appreciation, you will walk away from the deal, leaving the investor with the house. Meanwhile, if prices appreciate more than the agreed upon price, you buy at the lower agreed price and can turn around make a profit just by selling. Ask yourself, if the investor said you had to buy the house in 4 years at an agreed minimum price or whatever the market value is (whichever was higher), would you take the chance that the house would not appreciate to at least the minimum value? |